TUGSE or OSCC? The Twisted Diagnostic Challenge: A Case Series

Background & Aim: Chronic, non-healing oral ulcers often straddle the fine line between benign reactive lesions and malignancies. Such lesions merit vigilant evaluation. This case series delineates two confounding clinical scenarios, initially suspected as oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC), which were later histologically diagnosed as Traumatic Ulcerative Granuloma with Stromal Eosinophilia (TUGSE), enhancing the pivotal role of biopsy in averting misdiagnosis.

Case Overview: Two geriatric patients presented with persistent, painful ulcerative lesions on the lateral tongue for over 7–9 months. Clinically mimicking malignancy, both lesions exhibited induration and proliferative features. Histopathological examination post-excisional biopsy confirmed TUGSE. Conservative surgical management resulted in complete healing within two months, with no recurrence.

Conclusions: Clinicians must maintain a high index of suspicion and consider TUGSE in the differential diagnosis of persistent oral ulcers. Timely histological confirmation can prevent aggressive over treatment and offer immense psychological relief to the patient.

Clinical Significance: Despite its alarming appearance, TUGSE is a benign, self-resolving entity. Its close resemblance to OSCC mandates careful clinical and histological assessment to ensure appropriate therapeutic decisions.

1. Elzay RP. Traumatic ulcerative granuloma with stromal eosinophilia (Riga-Fede's disease and traumatic eosinophilic granuloma). Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1983;55(5):497-506.

2. Bhaskar SN, Lilly GE. Traumatic granuloma of the tongue (human and experimental). Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1964;18(2):206-18.

3. Magro CM, Crowson AN, Kovatich AJ, Burns F. Lupus profundus, indeterminate lymphocytic lobular panniculitis and subcutaneous T-cell lymphoma: a spectrum of subcuticular T-cell lymphoid dyscrasia. J Cutan Pathol. 2001;28(5):235-47.

4. Davoine F, Lacy P. Eosinophil cytokines, chemokines, and growth factors: emerging roles in immunity. Front Immunol. 2014:10;5:570.

5. Benitez B, Mülli J, Tzankov A, Kunz C. Traumatic ulcerative granuloma with stromal eosinophilia–clinical case report, literature review, and differential diagnosis. World J Surg Oncol. 2019;17(1):1-6.

6. Wolk R, Trochesset D. Traumatic ulcerative granuloma with stromal eosinophilia: from reactive process to low grade CD30+ lymphoproliferative disorder. Head Neck Pathol. 2025;19(1):70.

7. Ficarra G, Prignano F, Romagnoli P. Traumatic eosinophilic granuloma of the oral mucosa: a CD30+ (Ki-1) lymphoproliferative disorder?. Oral Oncol. 1997;33(5):375-9.

M K, Vijay MS, M A, S D. TUGSE or OSCC? The Twisted Diagnostic Challenge: A Case Series: A case reports/series. Oral Sci Rep [Internet]. 2026 May 28 [cited 2026 May 28];47(2):259-265. Available from: https://www.dent.cmu.ac.th/cmdj/frontend/web/?r=site/viewarticle&id=552

M, K., Vijay, MS., M, A. & S, D. (2026). TUGSE or OSCC? The Twisted Diagnostic Challenge: A Case Series. Oral Sci Rep, 47(2), 259-265. Retrieved from: https://www.dent.cmu.ac.th/cmdj/frontend/web/?r=site/viewarticle&id=552

M, K., Mallolu Anthony Sanjana Vijay,Arivuselvi M and Devi S. 2026. "TUGSE or OSCC? The Twisted Diagnostic Challenge: A Case Series." Oral Sci Rep, 47(2), 259-265. https://www.dent.cmu.ac.th/cmdj/frontend/web/?r=site/viewarticle&id=552

M, K. et al. 2026. 'TUGSE or OSCC? The Twisted Diagnostic Challenge: A Case Series', Oral Sci Rep, 47(2), 259-265. Retrieved from https://www.dent.cmu.ac.th/cmdj/frontend/web/?r=site/viewarticle&id=552

M, K., Vijay, MS., M, A. and S, D. "TUGSE or OSCC? The Twisted Diagnostic Challenge: A Case Series", Oral Sci Rep, vol.47, no. 2, pp. 259-265, May. 2026.

M, K., Vijay, MS., M, A., et al. "TUGSE or OSCC? The Twisted Diagnostic Challenge: A Case Series." Oral Sci Rep, vol.47, no. 2, May. 2026, pp. 259-265, https://www.dent.cmu.ac.th/cmdj/frontend/web/?r=site/viewarticle&id=552