How Do CAD/CAM Hybrid Materials Perform Under Cyclic Fatigue and High Occlusal Loads? A Mini-review Article
The rapid advancement of computer-aided design and manufacturing (CAD/CAM) technology has transformed restorative dentistry, offering materials that combine esthetic quality with mechanical durability for indirect restorations. This mini-review evaluates the fatigue resistance and fracture behavior of CAD/CAM hybrid materials, particularly under cyclic loading and high occlusal forces. The analysis encompasses both subtractive (milling) and additive (3D printing) manufacturing methods, emphasizing each method's advantages and limitations. Hybrid materials, such as polymer-infiltrated ceramic networks (e.g., Vita Enamic®), high-density resin composites (e.g., Cerasmart®), and laser-sintered composites (e.g., Edelweiss CAD/CAM BLOCK®), are discussed in terms of their mechanical properties, including flexural strength, hardness, and resilience under fatigue. Data from in vitro studies indicate that hybrid materials maintain high durability under static and cyclic fatigue conditions when fabricated at optimal thicknesses (1.0-1.5 mm), withstanding forces well = beyond typical masticatory loads. These properties make hybrid ceramics suitable for minimally invasive restorations that preserve tooth structure and minimize wear on opposing dentition. However, thinner restorations (≤0.8 mm) demonstrate increased susceptibility to fracture under high occlusal forces, particularly in patients with bruxism. The review underscores the need for standardized fatigue testing protocols that mimic clinical conditions more accurately to improve predictive validity.
1. Van Noort R. The future of dental devices is digital. Dent Mater. 2012;28(1):3-12.
2. Skorulska A, Piszko P, Rybak Z, Szymonowicz M, Dobrzyński M. Review on polymer, ceramic and composite materials for cad/cam indirect restorations in dentistry—Application, mechanical characteristics and comparison. Materials (Basel). 2021;14(7):1592.
3. Tian Y, Chen C, Xu X, Wang J, Hou X, Li K, et al. A review of 3D printing in dentistry: Technologies, affecting factors, and applications. Scanning. 2021;2021:9950131. doi: 10.1155/2021/9950131.
4. Suksuphan P, Krajangta N, Didron PP, Wasanapiarnpong T, Rakmanee T. Marginal adaptation and fracture resistance of milled and 3D-printed CAD/CAM hybrid dental crown materials with various occlusal thicknesses. J Prosthodont Res. 2024;68(2):326-35.
5. Garoushi S, Barlas D, Vallittu P, Uctasli M, Lassila L. Fracture behavior of short fiber-reinforced CAD/CAM inlay restorations after cyclic fatigue aging. Odontology. 2024;112(1):138-47.
6. Schlichting LH, Maia HP, Baratieri LN, Magne P. Novel-design ultra-thin CAD/CAM composite resin and ceramic occlusal veneers for the treatment of severe dental erosion. J Prosthet Dent. 2011;105(4):217-26.
7.Lawson NC, Bansal R, Burgess JO. Wear, strength, modulus and hardness of CAD/CAM restorative materials. Dent Mater. 2016;32(11):e275-e283.
8. Bajraktarova-Valjakova E, Korunoska-Stevkovska V, Kapusevska B, Gigovski N, Bajraktarova-Misevska C, Grozdanov A. Contemporary dental ceramic materials, a review: chemical composition, physical and mechanical properties, indications for use. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2018;6(9):1742-55.
9. Edelweiss-dentistry. Edelweiss-dentistry. Edelweiss CAD/CAM BLOCK: Instruction for use on Edelweiss-dentistry, Hoerbranz, Austria. 2021-12.
10. DeLong R, Douglas WH. An artificial oral environment for testing dental materials. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1991;38(4):339-45.
11. Lan TH, Chen PH, Fok ASL, Chen YF. Contact fracture test of monolithic hybrid ceramics on different substrates for bruxism. Dent Mater. 2022;38(1):44-56.
12. Reddy SV, Kumar MP, Sravanthi D, Mohsin AH, Anuhya V. Bruxism: a literature review. J Int Oral Health. 2014;6(6):105-9.
13. Koyano K, Tsukiyama Y, Ichiki R, Kuwata T. Assessment of bruxism in the clinic. J Oral Rehabil. 2008;35(7):495-508.
14. Al-Akhali M, Kern M, Elsayed A, Samran A, Chaar MS. Influence of thermomechanical fatigue on the fracture strength of CAD-CAM-fabricated occlusal veneers. J Prosthet Dent. 2019;121(4):644-50.
15. Zamzam H, Olivares A, Fok A. Load capacity of occlusal veneers of different restorative CAD/CAM materials under lateral static loading. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2021;115:104290.
16. Schlenz MA, Schmidt A, Rehmann P, Wöstmann B. Fatigue damage of monolithic posterior computer aided designed/computer aided manufactured crowns. J Prosthodont Res. 2019;63(3):368-73.
17. Velho HC, Dapieve KS, Pereira GKR, Fraga S, Valandro LF, Venturini AB. Accelerated loading frequency does not influence the fatigue behavior of polymer infiltrated ceramic network or lithium disilicate glass-ceramic restorations. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2020;110:103905.
18. Oudkerk J, Herman R, Eldafrawy M, Wulfman C, Ernst M, Vanheusden A, et al. Intraoral wear of PICN CAD-CAM composite restorations used in severe tooth wear treatment: 5-year results of a prospective clinical study using 3D profilometry. Dent Mater. 2024;40(7):1056-1063.
19. Alghauli M, Alqutaibi AY, Wille S, Kern M. Clinical outcomes and influence of material parameters on the behavior and survival rate of thin and ultrathin occlusal veneers: A systematic review. J Prosthodont Res. 2023;67(1):45-54.
20. Dietschi D, Devigus A. Prefabricated composite veneers: historical perspectives, indications and clinical application. Eur J Esthet Dent. 2011;6(2):178-87.
21. Baldi A, Carossa M, Comba A, Alovisi M, Femiano F, Pasqualini D, et al. Wear behaviour of polymer-infiltrated network ceramics, lithium disilicate and cubic zirconia against enamel in a bruxism-simulated scenario. Biomedicines. 2022;10(7):1682.