Ion-releasing Resin Composites as Clear Aligner Attachments: Comparison of Caries-inhibition Effect and Shear Bond Strength to Enamel
Objectives: To evaluate mineral loss and lesion depth of enamel adjacent to different ion-releasing resin composites in conjunction with artificial caries induction, and to evaluate shear bond strength to enamel.
Methods: Three ion-releasing resin composites (ACTIVA™ BioACTIVE-RESTORATIVE™, BEAUTIFIL Injectable XSL and Cention® N) with or without adhesive system were investigated in comparison with a conventional resin composite (Filtek™ Z350 XT). Effect of Caries Inhibition in Adjacent Enamel – 36 human premolars with cylindrical cavities and filled with restorative materials underwent 14 days of artificial caries induction and were sectioned into two cross-sectional specimens (n=12). Mineral loss and lesion depth were measured at 10, 260, 510, and 760 μm from the tooth-restoration interface and analyzed using repeated measures ANOVA and pairwise comparison for within group comparisons (p<0.05) and One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test for comparisons among groups (p<0.05). Shear bond strength test – 108 human premolars were embedded in self-curing acrylic resin. A polyethylene tube was placed on each surface and filled with restorative materials. Each group was divided into 2 subgroups (n=9) whether the specimens were thermocycled or not. Shear bond strength was tested with the Instron® 5566 universal testing machine. Failure analysis was conducted using a stereomicroscope. Shear bond strength was analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparison test (p<0.05).
Results: At 14 days post-caries simulation, ACTIVA™ BioACTIVE-RESTORATIVE™ and Cention® N with and without adhesive demonstrated an ability to inhibit caries formation at 10 μm from the restoration-enamel interface. Shear bond strength to enamel of Cention® N with adhesive had the highest values for both non-thermocycling (21.68±1.86 MPa) and thermocycling (21.17±2.4 MPa) condition, being significantly higher than other groups except for the conventional resin composite (20.3±1.85 MPa for non-thermocycling and 19.16±2.29) MPa for thermocycling condition.\
Conclusions: The use of Cention® N with adhesive provides the optimal combination of shear bond strength and caries inhibition effect, which is potentially a superior candidate for clear aligner attachments.
1. Jamilian A, Kiaee B, Sanayei S, Khosravi S, Perillo L. Orthodontic treatment of malocclusion and its impact on oral health-related quality of life. Open Dent J. 2016;10:236-41.
2. Morton J, Derakhshan M, Kaza S, Li C, Chen V. Design of the Invisalign system performance. Semin Orthod. 2016;23(1):3-11.
3. Jedliński M, Mazur M, Greco M, Belfus J, Grocholewicz K, Janiszewska-Olszowska J. Attachments for the orthodontic aligner treatment-atate of the art-A comprehensive systematic review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023;20(5):4481.
4. Feinberg KB, Souccar NM, Kau CH, Oster RA, Lawson NC. Translucency, stain resistance, and hardness of composites used for invisalign attachments. J Clin Orthod. 2016;50(3):170-6.
5. Barreda GJ, Dzierewianko EA, Muñoz KA, Piccoli GI. Surface wear of resin composites used for Invisalign® attachments. Acta Odontol Latinoam. 2017;30(2):90-5.
6. Kravitz ND, Kusnoto B, Agran B, Viana G. Influence of attachments and interproximal reduction on the accuracy of canine rotation with Invisalign. A prospective clinical study. Angle Orthod. 2008;78(4):682-7.
7. Julien KC, Buschang PH, Campbell PM. Prevalence of white spot lesion formation during orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthod. 2013;83(4):641-7.
8. Ruengrungsom C, Burrow MF, Parashos P, Palamara JEA. Evaluation of F, Ca, and P release and microhardness of eleven ion-leaching restorative materials and the recharge efficacy using a new Ca/P containing fluoride varnish. J Dent. 2020;102:103474. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2020.103474.
9. Persson A, Lingstrom P, van Dijken JW. Effect of a hydroxyl ion-releasing composite resin on plaque acidogenicity. Caries Res. 2005;39(3):201-6.
10. Porenczuk A, Jankiewicz B, Naurecka M, Bartosewicz B, Sierakowski B, Gozdowski D, et al. A comparison of the remineralizing potential of dental restorative materials by analyzing their fluoride release profiles. Adv Clin Exp Med. 2019;28(6):815-23.
11. Tiskaya M, Al-Eesa NA, Wong FSL, Hill RG. Characterization of the bioactivity of two commercial composites. Dent Mater. 2019;35(12):1757-68.
12. Rifai H, Qasim S, Mahdi S, Lambert MJ, Zarazir R, Amenta F, et al. In-vitro evaluation of the shear bond strength and fluoride release of a new bioactive dental composite material. J Clin Exp Dent. 2022;14(1):e55-e63.
13. Ltd. SDA-PP. BEAUTIFIL Injectable X : The one true bioactive injectable restorative [Internet]. 2021 [Available from: https://www.shofu.com.sg/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/BInjectableX-ref-1.pdf.
14. Bai X, Chen Y, Zhou T, Pow EHN, Tsoi JKH. The chemical and optical stability evaluation of injectable restorative materials under wet challenge. J Dent. 2024;146:105031.
15. Ilie N. Comparative effect of self- or dual-curing on polymerization kinetics and mechanical properties in a novel, dental-resin-based composite with alkaline filler. Running Title: Resin-composites with alkaline fillers. Materials (Basel). 2018;11(1):108.
16. Gupta N, Jaiswal S, Nikhil V, Gupta S, Jha P, Bansal P. Comparison of fluoride ion release and alkalizing potential of a new bulk-fill alkasite. J Conserv Dent. 2019;22(3):296-9.
17. Francois P, Fouquet V, Attal JP, Dursun E. Commercially available fluoride-releasing restorative materials: a review and a proposal for classification. Materials (Basel). 2020;13(10):2313.
18. Witty D, Kumaran P, Varma B, J SK, Xavier AM, Venugopal M, et al. Effect of prolonged water aging on the bond strength and marginal seal of three novel restorative materials. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2023;24(9):632-7.
19. Huang TT, He LH, Darendeliler MA, Swain MV. Correlation of mineral density and elastic modulus of natural enamel white spot lesions using X-ray microtomography and nanoindentation. Acta Biomater. 2010;6(12):4553-9.
20. Cochrane NJ, Cai F, Huq NL, Burrow MF, Reynolds EC. New approaches to enhanced remineralization of tooth enamel. J Dent Res. 2010;89(11):1187-97.
21. Pires PM, Santos TPD, Fonseca-Gonçalves A, Pithon MM, Lopes RT, Neves AA. A dual energy micro-CT methodology for visualization and quantification of biofilm formation and dentin demineralization. Arch Oral Biol. 2018;85:10-5. doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2017.09.034.
22. Mahoney E, Ismail FS, Kilpatrick N, Swain M. Mechanical properties across hypomineralized/hypoplastic enamel of first permanent molar teeth. Eur J Oral Sci. 2004;112(6):497-502.
23. Swain MV, Xue J. State of the art of Micro-CT applications in dental research. Int J Oral Sci. 2009;1(4):177-88.
24. Chen W, Qian L, Qian Y, Zhang Z, Wen X. Comparative study of three composite materials in bonding attachments for clear aligners. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2021;24(4):520-7.
25. Kircelli BH, Kilinc DD, Karaman A, Sadry S, Gonul EY, Gögen H. Comparison of the bond strength of five different composites used in the production of clear aligner attachments. J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2023;124(6):101481.
26. Alsaud BA, Hajjaj MS, Masoud AI, Abou Neel EA, Abuelenain DA, Linjawi AI. Bonding of clear aligner composite attachments to ceramic materials: an in vitro study. Materials (Basel). 2022;15(12).
27. ten Cate JM, Duijsters PP. Alternating demineralization and remineralization of artificial enamel lesions. Caries Res. 1982;16(3):201-10.
28. Arends J, ten Bosch JJ. Demineralization and remineralization evaluation techniques. J Dent Res. 1992;71 Spec No:924-8.
29. Kuphasuk S, Kunawarote S. In vitro caries inhibition in enamel adjacent to ion-releasing resin composite. CM Dent J. 2022;43(2):50-61.
30. Thitthaweerat S, Klinklao K, Senawongse P. Effect of modified smear layer on the bond strength of all-in-one adhesives to dentin. M Dent J. 2018;38(1):11-21.
31. Dionysopoulos D, Koliniotou-Koumpia E, Helvatzoglou-Antoniades M, Kotsanos N. In vitro inhibition of enamel demineralisation by fluoride-releasing restorative materials and dental adhesives. Oral Health Prev Dent. 2016;14(4):371-80.
32. Nagamine M, Itota T, Torii Y, Irie M, Staninec M, Inoue K. Effect of resin-modified glass ionomer cements on secondary caries. Am J Dent. 1997;10(4):173-8.
33. Itota T, Nakabo S, Iwai Y, Konishi N, Nagamine M, Torii Y, et al. Effect of adhesives on the inhibition of secondary caries around compomer restorations. Oper Dent. 2001;26(5):445-50.
34. Nikaido T, Takahashi R, Ariyoshi M, Sadr A, Tagami J. Protection and reinforcement of tooth structures by dental coating materials. Coatings. 2012;2(4):210-20.
35. Nikaido T, Weerasinghe DD, Waidyasekera K, Inoue G, Foxton RM, Tagami J. Assessment of the nanostructure of acid-base resistant zone by the application of all-in-one adhesive systems: super dentin formation. Biomed Mater Eng. 2009;19(2-3):163-71.
36. Li N, Nikaido T, Takagaki T, Sadr A, Makishi P, Chen J, et al. The role of functional monomers in bonding to enamel: acid-base resistant zone and bonding performance. J Dent. 2010;38(9):722-30.
37. Nikaido T, Ichikawa C, Li N, Takagaki T, Sadr A, Yoshida Y, et al. Effect of functional monomers in all-in-one adhesive aystems on formation of enamel/dentin acid-base resistant zone. Dent Mater J. 2011;30(5):576-82.
38. Cochrane NJ, Anderson P, Davis GR, Adams GG, Stacey MA, Reynolds EC. An x-ray microtomographic study of natural white-spot enamel lesions. J Dent Res. 2012;91(2):185-91.
39. Donly KJ, Segura A. Fluoride release and caries inhibition associated with a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement at varying fluoride loading doses. Am J Dent. 2002;15(1):8-10.
40. Kozai K, Suzuki J, Okada M, Nagasaka N. In vitro study of antibacterial and antiadhesive activities of fluoride-containing light-cured fissure sealants and a glass ionomer liner/base against oral bacteria. ASDC J Dent Child. 2000;67(2):117-22, 82-3.
41. Di Lauro A, Di Duca F, Montuori P, Dal Piva AMO, Tribst JPM, Borges ALS, et al. Fluoride and calcium release from alkasite and glass ionomer restorative dental materials: in vitro study. J Funct Biomater. 2023;14(2):109.
42. Daabash R, Alqahtani MQ, Price RB, Alshabib A, Niazy A, Alshaafi MM. Surface properties and Streptococcus mutans biofilm adhesion of ion-releasing resin-based composite materials. J Dent. 2023;134:104549.
43. Albelasy EH, Chen R, Fok A, Montasser M, Hamama HH, Mahmoud SH, et al. Inhibition of caries around restoration by ion-releasing restorative materials: an in vitro optical coherence tomography and micro-computed tomography evaluation. Materials (Basel). 2023;16(16):5558.
44. Colceriu Burtea L, Prejmerean C, Prodan D, Baldea I, Vlassa M, Filip M, et al. New Pre-reacted Glass Containing Dental Composites (giomers) with Improved Fluoride Release and Biocompatibility. Materials (Basel). 2019;12(23):4021.
45. Asmussen E, Peutzfeldt A. Long-term fluoride release from a glass ionomer cement, a compomer, and from experimental resin composites. Acta Odontol Scand. 2002;60(2):93-7.
46. Itota T, Nakabo S, Narukami T, Tashiro Y, Torii Y, McCabe JF, et al. Effect of two-step adhesive systems on inhibition of secondary caries around fluoride-releasing resin composite restorations in root dentine. J Dent. 2005;33(2):147-54.
47. Vercruysse CW, De Maeyer EA, Verbeeck RM. Fluoride release of polyacid-modified composite resins with and without bonding agents. Dent Mater. 2001;17(4):354-8.
48. Burrow MF, Inokoshi S, Tagami J. Water sorption of several bonding resins. Am J Dent. 1999;12(6):295-8.
49. Serra MC, Cury JA. The in vitro effect of glass-ionomer cement restoration on enamel subjected to a demineralization and remineralization model. Quintessence Int. 1992;23(2):143-7.
50. Rossini G, Parrini S, Castroflorio T, Deregibus A, Debernardi CL. Efficacy of clear aligners in controlling orthodontic tooth movement: a systematic review. Angle Orthod. 2015;85(5):881-9.
51. Kravitz ND, Kusnoto B, BeGole E, Obrez A, Agran B. How well does Invisalign work? A prospective clinical study evaluating the efficacy of tooth movement with Invisalign. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009;135(1):27-35.
52. Pereira R, Lima D, Giorgi MCC, Marchi GM, Aguiar FHB. Evaluation of bond strength, nanoleakage, and marginal adaptation of bulk-fill composites submitted to thermomechanical aging. J Adhes Dent. 2019;21(3):255-64.
53. Ruengrungsom C, Burrow MF, Parashos P, Palamara JEA. Comprehensive characterisation of flexural mechanical properties and a new classification for porosity of 11 contemporary ion-leaching dental restorative materials. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2021;121:104615.
54. Daabash R, Alshabib A, Alqahtani MQ, Price RB, Silikas N, Alshaafi MM. Ion releasing direct restorative materials: Key mechanical properties and wear. Dent Mater. 2022;38(12):1866-77.
55. Hughes KO, Powell KJ, Hill AE, Tantbirojn D, Versluis A. Delayed photoactivation of dual-cure composites: effect on cuspal flexure, depth-of-cure, and mechanical properties. Oper Dent. 2019;44(2):e97-e104.
56. Wierichs RJ, Rupp K, Meyer-Lueckel H, Apel C, Esteves-Oliveira M. Effects of dentifrices differing in fluoride content on remineralization characteristics of dentin in vitro. Caries Res. 2020;54(1):75-86.
57. Fu Y, Ekambaram M, Li KC, Zhang Y, Cooper PR, Mei ML. In vitro models used in cariology mineralisation research-a review of the literature. Dent J (Basel). 2024;12(10):323.
58. Chen H, Zhang J, Hill R, Baysan A. Evaluation of toothpastes for treating root carious lesions - a laboratory-based pilot study. BMC Oral Health. 2024;24(1):484.
59. Takagi S, Liao H, Chow LC. Effect of tooth-bound fluoride on enamel demineralization/ remineralization in vitro. Caries Res. 2000;34(4):281-8.
60. Lynch RJ, Mony U, ten Cate JM. Effect of lesion characteristics and mineralizing solution type on enamel remineralization in vitro. Caries Res. 2007;41(4):257-62.
61. Birant S, Gümüştaş B. The effect of thermal aging on microhardness and SEM/EDS for characterisation bioactive filling materials. BMC Oral Health. 2024;24(1):1142.
62. Farooq I, Bugshan A. The role of salivary contents and modern technologies in the remineralization of dental enamel: a narrative review. F1000Res. 2020;9:171.