Apical Debris Extrusion of Rotary and Reciprocating Files Combined with Two Supplementary Irrigation Techniques

Objectives: To quantify the amount of debris extrusion after root canal instrumentation with rotary (Zenflex; ZF) and reciprocating (EdgeOne Fire; EOF) file systems combined with either Manual Dynamic Activation (MDA) or Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation (PUI).

Methods: Ninety mandibular molars with complete root formation and 10°-20° curvature were selected, disinfected, and stored. Teeth with immature apex, resorption, caries, or calcified canals were excluded. High-speed diamond burs accessed the teeth and mesial roots were used for investigation. Specimen were randomly divided into 6 groups (n=15) based on file (ZF and EOF) and irrigation systems(MDA and PUI). The apical size of prepared root canal was 25. The Myers and Montgomery method was used to collect apical debris. Debris extrusion was measured by weighing tubes preand post-experiment after incubating for 5 days. The mean weight differences of debris extrusion among file and irrigation system groups were compared using Two-wayANOVA with Tukey’s test.

Results: The statistics showed a significant effect of irrigation technique on debris extrusion (p=0.002), while file system (p=0.698) and interaction (p=0.406) were not significant. PUI as an adjunctive irrigation with ZF and EOF (mean=0.19±0.17 and 0.19±0.14 µg respectively) significantly reduced debris extrusion compared to reciprocating EOF systems without adjunctive irrigation technique (mean=0.37±0.13 µg) (p=0.020 and p=0.017, respectively).

Conclusions: Irrigation technique significantly influenced debris extrusion, while file system had no effect. The use of PUI with both file systems reduced debris extrusion compared to EOF without adjunctive irrigation.

1.Roshdy NN, Hassan R. Quantitative evaluation of apically extruded debris using TRUShape, TruNatomy, and WaveOne Gold in curved canals. BDJ Open. 2022;8(1):13.

2.Nayak G, Singh I, Shetty S, Dahiya S. Evaluation of apical extrusion of debris and irrigant using two new reciprocating and one continuous rotation single file systems. J Dent (Tehran). 2014;11(3):302-9.

3.Bürklein S, Schäfer E. Apically extruded debris with reciprocating single-file and full-sequence rotary instrumentation systems. J Endod. 2012;38(6):850-2.

4.Ujariya U, Patel A, Kothari A, Bharatiya R. Comparative evaluation of apical debris extrusion during root canal preparation using three different file systems: an in vitro study. Endodontology. 2020;32(1):20-5.

5.Zanza A, Russo P, Reda R, Di Matteo P, Donfrancesco O, Ausiello P, et al. Mechanical and metallurgical evaluation of 3 different nickel-titanium rotary instruments: an in vitro and in laboratory study. Bioengineering (Basel). 2022;9(5).

6.Gambarini G, Galli M, Di Nardo D, Seracchiani M, Donfrancesco O, Testarelli L. Differences in cyclic fatigue lifespan between two different heat treated NiTi endodontic rotary instruments: WaveOne Gold vs EdgeOne Fire. J Clin Exp Dent. 2019;11(7):e609-e13.

7.Rome WJ, Doran JE, Walker WA 3rd. The effectiveness of Gly-Oxide and sodium hypochlorite in preventing smear layer formation. J Endod. 1985;11(7):281-8.

8.O'Connell MS, Morgan LA, Beeler WJ, Baumgartner JC. A comparative study of smear layer removal using different salts of EDTA. J Endod. 2000;26(12):739-43.

9.Chow TW. Mechanical effectiveness of root canal irrigation. J Endod. 1983;9(11):475-9.

10.Boutsioukis C, Lambrianidis T, Kastrinakis E, Bekiaroglou P. Measurement of pressure and flow rates during irrigation of a root canal ex vivo with three endodontic needles. Int Endod J. 2007;40(7):504-13.

11.McGill S, Gulabivala K, Mordan N, Ng YL. The efficacy of dynamic irrigation using a commercially available system (RinsEndo) determined by removal of a collagen 'bio-molecular film' from an ex vivo model. Int Endod J. 2008;41(7):602-8.

12.Huang TY, Gulabivala K, Ng YL. A bio-molecular film ex-vivo model to evaluate the influence of canal dimensions and irrigation variables on the efficacy of irrigation. Int Endod J. 2008;41(1):60-71.

13.Andrabi SM, Kumar A, Mishra SK, Tewari RK, Alam S, Siddiqui S. Effect of manual dynamic activation on smear layer removal efficacy of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid and SmearClear: an in vitro scanning electron microscopic study. Aust Endod J. 2013;39(3):131-6.

14.Vande Visse JE, Brilliant JD. Effect of irrigation on the production of extruded material at the root apex during instrumentation. J Endod. 1975;1(7):243-6.

15.Mitchell RP, Baumgartner JC, Sedgley CM. Apical extrusion of sodium hypochlorite using different root canal irrigation systems. J Endod. 2011;37(12):1677-81.

16.Gummadi A, Panchajanya S, Ashwathnarayana S, Santhosh L, Jaykumar T, Shetty A. Apical extrusion of debris following the use of single-file rotary/reciprocating systems, combined with syringe or ultrasonically-facilitated canal irrigation. J Conserv Dent. 2019;22(4):351-5.

17.Schneider SW. A comparison of canal preparations in straight and curved root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1971;32(2):271-5.

18.Myers GL, Montgomery S. A comparison of weights of debris extruded apically by conventional filing and Canal Master techniques. J Endod. 1991;17(6):275-9.

19.Yılmaz K, Özyürek T. Cyclic fatigue life of Tango-Endo, WaveOne GOLD, and Reciproc NiTi instruments. Restor Dent Endod. 2017;42(2):134-9.

20.Seltzer S, Naidorf IJ. Flare-ups in endodontics: I. Etiological factors. 1985. J Endod. 2004;30(7):476-81.

21.İnce-Yusufoğlu S, Keskin NB, Uslu G, Helvacioglu-Yigit D. Effect of EDDY and manual dynamic activation techniques on postoperative pain in non-surgical retreatment: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Oral Health. 2023;23(1):3.

22.Tanalp J, Güngör T. Apical extrusion of debris: a literature review of an inherent occurrence during root canal treatment. Int Endod J. 2014;47(3):211-21.

23.Arias A, de la Macorra JC, Hidalgo JJ, Azabal M. Predictive models of pain following root canal treatment: a prospective clinical study. Int Endod J. 2013;46(8):784-93.

24.Nair PNR. On the causes of persistent apical periodontitis: a review. International Endodontic Journal. 2006;39(4):249-81.

25.Delvarani A, Mohammadzadeh Akhlaghi N, Aminirad R, Tour Savadkouhi S, Vahdati SA. In vitro comparison of apical debris extrusion using rotary and reciprocating systems in severely curved root canals. Iran Endod J. 2017;12(1):34-7.

26.Eliasz W, Czarnecka B, Surdacka A. Apical extrusion of debris during root canal preparation with ProTaper Next, WaveOne Gold and Twisted Files. Materials (Basel). 2021;14(21):6254.

27.Barbosa AFA, Lima CO, Sassone LM, Fares RD, Fidalgo T, Silva E. Effect of passive ultrasonic irrigation on hard tissue debris removal: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Braz Oral Res. 2021;35:e123. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2021.vol35.0123.

28.Macedo R, Verhaagen B, Rivas DF, Versluis M, Wesselink P, van der Sluis L. Cavitation measurement during sonic and ultrasonic activated irrigation. J Endod. 2014;40(4):580-3.

29.Boutsioukis C, Psimma Z, Kastrinakis E. The effect of flow rate and agitation technique on irrigant extrusion ex vivo. Int Endod J. 2014;47(5):487-96.

30.Pereira RP, Bramante CM, Duarte MAH, Alcalde MP, Piai CGS, Vivan RR. Postoperative Pain after using passive ultrasonic irrigation and easyclean device, irrigation activation techniques: a randomized clinical trial. J Endod. 2023;49(6):632-7.

31.Liapis D, De Bruyne MAA, De Moor RJG, Meire MA. Postoperative pain after ultrasonically and laser-activated irrigation during root canal treatment: a randomized clinical trial. Int Endod J. 2021;54(7):1037-50.

32.Caviedes-Bucheli J, Castellanos F, Vasquez N, Ulate E, Munoz HR. The influence of two reciprocating single-file and two rotary-file systems on the apical extrusion of debris and its biological relationship with symptomatic apical periodontitis. a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Endod J. 2016;49(3):255-70.

Klanliang K, Surapolchai M, Veeraklaew M, Maezono H. Apical Debris Extrusion of Rotary and Reciprocating Files Combined with Two Supplementary Irrigation Techniques: Original articles. Oral Sci Rep [Internet]. 2025 May 29 [cited 2025 May 31];46(2):77-84. Available from: https://www.dent.cmu.ac.th/cmdj/frontend/web/?r=site/viewarticle&id=503

Klanliang, K., Surapolchai, M., Veeraklaew, M. & Maezono, H. (2025). Apical Debris Extrusion of Rotary and Reciprocating Files Combined with Two Supplementary Irrigation Techniques. Oral Sci Rep, 46(2), 77-84. Retrieved from: https://www.dent.cmu.ac.th/cmdj/frontend/web/?r=site/viewarticle&id=503

Klanliang, K., Meanna Surapolchai,Michell Veeraklaew and Hazuki Maezono. 2025. "Apical Debris Extrusion of Rotary and Reciprocating Files Combined with Two Supplementary Irrigation Techniques." Oral Sci Rep, 46(2), 77-84. https://www.dent.cmu.ac.th/cmdj/frontend/web/?r=site/viewarticle&id=503

Klanliang, K. et al. 2025. 'Apical Debris Extrusion of Rotary and Reciprocating Files Combined with Two Supplementary Irrigation Techniques', Oral Sci Rep, 46(2), 77-84. Retrieved from https://www.dent.cmu.ac.th/cmdj/frontend/web/?r=site/viewarticle&id=503

Klanliang, K., Surapolchai, M., Veeraklaew, M. and Maezono, H. "Apical Debris Extrusion of Rotary and Reciprocating Files Combined with Two Supplementary Irrigation Techniques", Oral Sci Rep, vol.46, no. 2, pp. 77-84, May. 2025.

Klanliang, K., Surapolchai, M., Veeraklaew, M., et al. "Apical Debris Extrusion of Rotary and Reciprocating Files Combined with Two Supplementary Irrigation Techniques." Oral Sci Rep, vol.46, no. 2, May. 2025, pp. 77-84, https://www.dent.cmu.ac.th/cmdj/frontend/web/?r=site/viewarticle&id=503