Glass Hybrid Glass Ionomer Restorative Materials: A Literature Review
The emergence of glass hybrid glass ionomers (GH-GICs) represents a significant innovation in restorative dentistry, addressing the limitations of traditional materials through enhanced mechanical strength, fluoride release, and ease of application. Given the absence of prior comprehensive literature reviews on this topic, this systematic review was conducted to provide general practitioners with essential insights. A comprehensive literature search was performed in the PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases from 2010-2023, using terms related to GH-GICs, their properties, and their clinical performance. The studies included were published in English and included in vitro and in vivo research as well as randomized controlled trials. Compared with conventional glass ionomers, GH-GICs exhibit improved mechanical properties, fluoride release, and remineralization potential, showing clinical performance comparable to that of resin composites in small to moderate class I and class II posterior restorations. However, limitations such as marginal adaptation, surface wear, and reduced aesthetics persist, particularly in larger restorations. While resin coatings improve initial wear resistance, their limited longevity and reduced fluoride release present additional concerns. GH-GICs remain promising for specific clinical scenarios, especially in high-caries-risk, pediatric, and geriatric patients, but further long-term studies are needed to confirm their efficacy fully and extend their applications.
1. Sengupta A, Naka O, Mehta SB, Banerji S. The clinical performance of bulk-fill versus the incremental layered application of direct resin composite restorations: a systematic review. Evid Based Dent. 2023;24(3):1–11.
2. Arbildo-Vega HI, Lapinska B, Panda S, Lamas-Lara C, Khan AS, Lukomska-Szymanska M. Clinical effectiveness of bulk-fill and conventional resin composite restorations: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Polymers (Basel). 2020;12(8):1–51.
3. Cidreira Boaro LC, Pereira Lopes D, de Souza ASC, Lie Nakano E, Ayala Perez MD, Pfeifer CS, et al. Clinical performance and chemical-physical properties of bulk fill composites resin —a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dent Mater. 2019;35(10):e249–64.
4. Veloso SRM, Lemos CAA, de Moraes SLD, do Egito Vasconcelos BC, Pellizzer EP, de Melo Monteiro GQ. Clinical performance of bulk-fill and conventional resin composite restorations in posterior teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Investig. 2019;23(1):221–33.
5. de Lima Navarro MF, Pascotto RC, Borges AFS, Soares CJ, Raggio DP, Rios D, et al. Consensus on glass-ionomer cement thresholds for restorative indications. J Dent. 2021;107:1–8.
6. Francois P, Fouquet V, Attal J-P, Dursun E. Commercially available fluoride-releasing restorative materials: a review and a proposal for classification philippe. Materials (Basel). 2020;13:1–28.
7. Gurgan S, Kutuk ZB, Yalcin Cakir F, Ergin E. A randomized controlled 10 years follow up of a glass ionomer restorative material in class I and class II cavities. J Dent. 2020;94:103175.
8. Brkanović S, Ivanišević A, Miletić I, Mezdić D, Krmek SJ. Effect of nano-filled protective coating and different ph enviroment on wear resistance of new glass hybrid restorative material. Materials (Basel). 2021;14(4):1–10.
9. Friedl K, Hiller KA, Friedl KH. Clinical performance of a new glass ionomer based restoration system: a retrospective cohort study. Dent Mater. 2011;27(10):1031–7.
10. Burke FJT. Dental materials - What goes where? The current status of glass ionomer as a material for loadbearing restorations in posterior teeth. Dent Update. 2013;40(10):840–4.
11. Hesse D, Bonifácio CC, Guglielmi C de AB, Bönecker M, van Amerongen WE, Raggio DP. Bilayer technique and nano-filled coating increase success of approximal ART restorations: A randomized clinical trial. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2016;26(3):231–9.
12. Gemert-Schriks MCM, Amerongen WE, Cate JM, Aartman IHA. Three-year survival of single- and two-surface ART restorations in a high-caries child population. Clin Oral Investig. 2007;11(4):337–43.
13. Xie D, Brantley WA, Culbertson BM, Wang G. Mechanical properties and microstructures of glass-ionomer cements. Dent Mater. 2000;16(2):129–38.
14. Diem VTK, Tyas MJ, Ngo HC, Phuong LH, Khanh ND. The effect of a nano-filled resin coating on the 3-year clinical performance of a conventional high-viscosity glass-ionomer cement. Clin Oral Investig. 2014;18(3):753–9.
15. Yunus G, Sharma H, Itagi AH, Srivastava H. A comparative survival analysis of high viscosity glass ionomer restorations using conventional cavity preparation and atraumatic restorative treatment technique in primary molars: a randomized clinical trial. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2021;18(1):95.
16. Phonghanyudh A, Theerareungchaisri C, Jirarattanasopa V. Clinical evaluation of class II high-viscosity glass ionomer cement and composite resin restorations in primary molars: one year result. M Dent J. 2014;34(2):129–36.
17. Zanata RL, Magalhães AC, Lauris JRP, Atta MT, Wang L, Navarro MFDL. Microhardness and chemical analysis of high-viscous glass-ionomer cement after 10 years of clinical service as ART restorations. J Dent. 2011;39(12):834–40.
18. Mickenautsch S. High-viscosity glass-ionomer cements for direct posterior tooth restorations in permanent teeth: the evidence in brief. J Dent. 2016;55:121–3.
19. Molina G, Faulks D, Mulder J, Frencken J. High-viscosity glass-ionomer vs. composite resin restorations in persons with disability: Five-year follow-up of clinical trial. Braz Oral Res. 2019;33(e099):1–9.
20. Boing TF, de Geus JL, Wambier LM, Loguercio AD, Reis A, Gomes OMM. Are glass-ionomer cement restorations in cervical lesions more long-lasting than resin-based composite resins? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Adhes Dent. 2018;20(5):435–52.
21. Magne P, Silva S, Andrada M de, Maia H. Fatigue resistance and crack propensity of novel “super-closed” sandwich composite resin restorations in large MOD defects. Int J Esthet Dent. 2016;11(1):82–97.
22. Farshidfar N, Agharokh M, Ferooz M, Bagheri R. Microtensile bond strength of glass ionomer cements to a resin composite using universal bonding agents with and without acid etching. Heliyon. 2022;8(2):e08858.
23. Cribari L, Madeira L, Roeder RBR, Macedo RM, Wambier LM, Porto TS, et al. High-viscosity glass-ionomer cement or composite resin for restorations in posterior permanent teeth? A systematic review and meta-analyses. J Dent. 2023;137:104629.
24. Hatirli H, Yasa B, Çelik EU. Clinical performance of high-viscosity glass ionomer and resin composite on minimally invasive occlusal restorations performed without rubber-dam isolation: a two-year randomised split-mouth study. Clin Oral Investig. 2021;25(9):5493–503.
25. Uyumaz FÜ, Abaklı İnci M, Özer H. Could bulk fill glass hybrid restorative materials replace composite resins in treating permanent teeth? a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2023;1–8.
26. Kharma K, Zogheib T, Bhandi S, Mehanna C. Clinical evaluation of microhybrid composite and glass ionomer restorative material in permanent teeth. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2018;19(2):226–32.
27. Uzel I, Aykut-Yetkiner A, Ersin N, Ertugrul F, Atila E, Özcan M. Evaluation of glass-ionomer versus bulk-fill resin composite: a two-year randomized clinical study. Materials (Basel). 2022;15(20):1–10.
28. El-Bialy MR, Shaalan OO, El-Zohairy AA, El-Zoghby AF. Clinical evaluation of glass ionomer with glass hybrid technology versus conventional high viscosity glass ionomer in class I cavities in patients with high caries risk: randomized controlled trial. J Int Oral Heal. 2020;12(3):203–12.
29. Balkaya H, Arslan S, Pala K. A randomized, prospective clinical study evaluating effectiveness of a bulk-fill composite resin, a conventional composite resin and a reinforced glass ionomer in class II cavities: one-year results. J Appl Oral Sci. 2019;27:1–12.
30. Klinke T, Daboul A, Turek A, Frankenberger R, Hickel R, Biffar R. Clinical performance during 48 months of two current glass ionomer restorative systems with coatings: a randomized clinical trial in the field. Trials. 2016;17(1):239. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1339-8.
31. Rozniatowski P, Korporowicz E, Gozdowski D, Olczak-Kowalczyk D. Clinical study on resin composite and glass ionomer materials in II class restorations in permanent teeth. J Clin Exp Dent. 2021;13(2):165–71.
32. Heck K, Frasheri I, Diegritz C, Manhart J, Hickel R, Fotiadou C. Six-year results of a randomized controlled clinical trial of two glass ionomer cements in class II cavities. J Dent. 2020;97:103333.
33. Türkün LS, Kanik O. A prospective six-year clinical study evaluating reinforced glass ionomer cements with resin coating on posterior teeth: quo vadis? Oper Dent. 2016;41(6):587–98.
34. Moshaverinia M, Navas A, Jahedmanesh N, Shah KC, Moshaverinia A, Ansari S. Comparative evaluation of the physical properties of a reinforced glass ionomer dental restorative material. J Prosthet Dent. 2019;122(2):154–9.
35. Kunte S, Shah SB, Patil S, Shah P, Patel A, Chaudhary S. Comparative Evaluation of Compressive Strength and Diametral Tensile Strength of Conventional Glass Ionomer Cement and a Glass Hybrid Glass Ionomer Cement. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2022;15(4):398–401.
36. Mickenautsch S. Are high-viscosity glass-ionomer cements inferior to silver amalgam as restorative materials for permanent posterior teeth? a bayesian analysis. BMC Oral Health. 2015;15(1):1–8.
37. Fuhrmann D, Murchison D, Whipple S, Vandewalle K. Properties of new glass-ionomer restorative systems marketed for stress-bearing areas. Oper Dent. 2020;45(1):104–10.
38. Yeo HW, Loo MY, Alkhabaz M, Li KC, Choi JJE, Barazanchi A. Bulk-fill direct restorative materials: an in vitro assessment of their physio-mechanical properties. Oral. 2021;1(2):75–87.
39. Moshaverinia M, de Almeida Queiroz Ferreira L, Smidt G, Shah KC, Ansari S, Moshaverinia A. Evaluation of mechanical, optical, and fluoride-releasing properties of a translucent bulk fill glass hybrid restorative dental material. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2024;36(3):503–11.
40. Šalinović I, Stunja M, Schauperl Z, Verzak Ž, Malčić AI, Rajić VB. Mechanical properties of high viscosity glass ionomer and glass hybrid restorative materials. Acta Stomatol Croat. 2019;53(2):125–31.
41. Neves AB, Lopes LIG, Bergstrom TG, Silva ASS da, Lopes RT, Neves A de A. Porosity and pore size distribution in high-viscosity and conventional glass ionomer cements: a micro-computed tomography study. Restor Dent Endod. 2021;46(4):1–9.
42. Cabello Malagón I, Cánovas Hernández B, Martínez Hernández E, Serna-Muñoz C, Pérez-Silva A, Ortiz-Ruiz AJ. Analysis of the porosity and microhardness of glass ionomer cements.
Mater Sci Medzg. 2022;28(1):113–9.
43. Arnold S, Buchanan GD, Warren N, Potgieter N. Comparison of capsule-mixed versus hand-mixed glass ionomer cements Part II: Porosity. South African Dent J. 2022;77(02):65–72.
44. Gurgan S, Kutuk ZB, Ergin E, Oztas SS, Cakir FY. Clinical performance of a glass ionomer restorative system: a 6-year evaluation. Clin Oral Investig. 2017;21(7):2335–43.
45. Burke FJT, Mackenzie L, Sands P. Fifty years of glass ionomers (gics). are the latest gics suitable for restoring back teeth?. Dent Update. 2023;50(5):437–46.
46. Kutuk Z, Ozturk C, Cakir F, Gurgan S. Mechanical performance of a newly developed glass hybrid restorative in the restoration of large MO class 2 cavities. Niger J Clin Pract. 2019;22(6):1070–7.
47. Valeri AS, Sulaiman TA, Wright JT, Donovan TE. In vitro wear of glass-ionomer containing restorative materials. Oper Dent. 2022;47(6):678–85.
48. Alebady MH, Hamama HH, Mahmoud SH. Effect of various surface coating methods on surface roughness, micromorphological analysis and fluoride release from contemporary glass ionomer restorations. BMC Oral Health. 2024;24(1):504.
49. Moghimi M, Jafarpour D, Ferooz R, Bagheri R. Protective effect of a nanofilled resin-based coating on wear resistance of glass ionomer cement restorative materials. BMC Oral Health. 2022;22(1):1–7.
50. Kanik Ö, Turkun LS, Dasch W. In vitro abrasion of resin-coated highly viscous glass ionomer cements: a confocal laser scanning microscopy study. Clin Oral Investig. 2017;21(3):821–9.
51. Habib SI, Yassen AA, Bayoumi RE. Influence of nanocoats on the physicomechanical properties and microleakage of bulk-fill and resin-modified glass ionomer cements: an in vitro study. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2021;22(1):62–8.
52. Handoko M, Tjandrawinata R, Octarina. The effect of nanofilled resin coating on the hardness of glass ionomer cement. Sci Dent J. 2020;4(3):97.
53. Jafarpour D, Mese A, Ferooz M, Bagheri R. The effects of nanofilled resin-based coatings on the physical properties of glass ionomer cement restorative materials. J Dent. 2019;89:103177.
54. Ong JEX, Yap AU, Hong JY, Eweis AH, Yahya NA. Viscoelastic properties of contemporary bulk-fill restoratives: a dynamicmechanical analysis. Oper Dent. 2018;43(3):307–14.
55. Kielbassa AM, Oehme EP, Shakavets N, Wolgin M. In vitro wear of (resin-coated) high-viscosity glass ionomer cements and glass hybrid restorative systems. J Dent. 2021;105:103554.
56. Hegde D, Suprabha BS, Rao A. Organic antibacterial modifications of high-viscosity glass ionomer cement for atraumatic restorative treatment: A review. Jpn Dent Sci Rev. 2024;60:22–31.
57. Puttipanampai O, Panpisut P, Sitthisettapong T. Assessment of Fluoride-Releasing Materials in Remineralization of Adjacent Demineralized Enamel. Appl Sci. 2025;15(4):1–14.
58. Ghilotti J, Fernández I, Sanz JL, Melo M, Llena C. Remineralization potential of three restorative glass ionomer cements: an in vitro study. J Clin Med. 2023;12(6):1–14.
59. Zebić ML, Jakovljević N, Miletić V. Fluoride release from conventional, resin-modified and hybrid glass ionomer cements. Serbian Dent J. 2019;65(4):187–94.
60. Par M, Gubler A, Attin T, Tarle Z, Tarle A, Prskalo K, et al. Effect of adhesive coating on calcium, phosphate, and fluoride release from experimental and commercial remineralizing dental restorative materials. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):1–17.
61. Krajangta N, Dulsamphan C, Chotitanmapong T. Effects of protective surface coating on fluoride release and recharge of recent uncoated high-viscosity glass ionomer cement. Dent J. 2022;10(12):1–10.
62. Banic Vidal LS, Veček NN, Šalinović I, Miletić I, Klarić E, Jukić Krmek S. Short-term fluoride release from ion-releasing dental materials. Acta Stomatol Croat. 2023;57(3):229–37.
63. Rajić VB, Miletić I, Gurgan S, Peroš K, Verzak Ž, Malčić AI. Fluoride release from glass ionomer with nano filled coat and varnish. Acta Stomatol Croat. 2018;52(4):307–13.
64. Kielbassa AM, Oehme EP, Shakavets N, Wolgin M. In vitro wear of (resin-coated) high-viscosity glass ionomer cements and glass hybrid restorative systems. J Dent. 2021;105:103554.
65. Karadas M, Cantekin K, Gumus H, Ateş SM, Duymuş ZY. Evaluation of the bond strength of different adhesive agents to a resin-modified calcium silicate material (TheraCal LC). Scanning. 2016;38(5):403–11.
66. Latta MA, Tsujimoto A, Takamizawa T, Barkmeier WW. Enamel and dentin bond durability of self-adhesive restorative materials. J Adhes Dent. 2020;22(1):99–105.
67. Avila W de M, Hesse D, Bonifacio CC. Surface conditioning prior to the application of glass- ionomer cement: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Adhes Dent. 2019;21(5):391–9.
68. Gürler S, Demirel A, Buyuksungur A. The evaluation of internal adaptation of glass ionomer restorations applied after the use of different cavity conditioners in primary teeth: an in-vitro study. BMC Oral Health. 2025;25(1).
69. Khan M, Kaur H, Choudhary R, Yeluri R. Effect of three different conditioning agents on cavosurface microleakage and bond strength of glass ionomer restorations – an in vitro study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2022;40:180–7.
70. Lopes LELS, Tedesco TK, Calvo AFB, Imparato JCP, Raggio DP, Mendes FM, et al. Is prior conditioning of dentin necessary in restoration with glass-ionomer cement? a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Int J Adhes Adhes. 2021;104:102748.
71. Suresh N, Chandrasekaran S, Ashritha MCV, Raoufe MA, Vasudevan A, Natanasabapathy V. Phosphoric acid treatment enhances adaptation of glass-ionomer cement to bioceramic sealer-conditioned dentin. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2023;20(1):84.
72. Singh S, Goel D, Awasthi N, Khandelwal D, Sharma A, Patil S. Comparative evaluation of marginal integrity of three esthetic restorative materials – an in-vitro study. Contemp Clin Dent. 2021;12(3):241–6.
73. Ali A, EL-Malt M, Mohamed E. A Comparative evaluation of equia forte microleakage versus resin-modified glass ionomer. Al-Azhar Dent J Girls. 2019;6(3):249–54.
74. Alsari A, Ghilotti J, Sanz JL, Llena C, Folguera S, Melo M. Comparative evaluation of the microleakage of glass ionomers as restorative materials : a systematic review of in vitro studies. Appl Sci. 2024;14(1729):1–20.
75. Francois P, Vennat E, Le Goff S, Ruscassier N, Attal JP, Dursun E. Shear bond strength and interface analysis between a resin composite and a recent high-viscous glass ionomer cement bonded with various adhesive systems. Clin Oral Investig. 2019;23(6):2599–608.
76. Alqasabi SY, Sulimany AM, Almohareb T, Alayad AS, Bawazir OA. The effect of different coating agents on the microhardness, water sorption, and solubility of EQUIA Forte® HT. Coatings. 2024;14(6):751.
77. Gurgan S, Kutuk Z, Ozturk C, Soleimani R, Cakir F. Clinical performance of a glass hybrid restorative in extended size class II cavities. Oper Dent. 2020;45(3):243–54.
78. Wafaie RA, Ibrahim Ali A, El-Negoly SAER, Mahmoud SH. Five-year randomized clinical trial to evaluate the clinical performance of high-viscosity glass ionomer restorative systems in small class II restorations. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2023;35(3):538–55.
79. Miletić I, Baraba A, Krmek SJ, Perić T, Marković D, Basso M, et al. Clinical performance of a glass-hybrid system in comparison with a resin composite in two-surface class II restorations: a 5-year randomised multi-centre study. Clin Oral Investig. 2024;28(1):1–12.
80. Balkaya H, Arslan S. A two-year clinical comparison of three different restorative materials in class II cavities. Oper Dent. 2020;45(1):E32–42.
81. Gurses M, İnan B, Çobanoglu N. Clinical evaluation of class II restorations made with bulk-fill restorative materials. Bezmialem Sci. 2023;11(2):141–50.
82. Uyumaz FÜ, Abaklı İnci M, Özer H. Could bulk fill glass hybrid restorative materials replace composite resins in treating permanent teeth? a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2024;36(5):702-709.
83. Abuzinadah AJ, Merdad YMA, Aldharrab RS, Almutairi WA, Yeslam HE, Hasanain FA. Microhardness and compressive strength of bulk fill glass hybrid material and other direct restorative materials. J Compos Sci. 2024;8(12):508.