Consideration Factors for Post and Core with Crown Restorations
Many factors should be considered for restoration of root-canal-treated teeth using posts and cores with crowns, such as materials of posts, cores and luting cements. The posts using now, there are the form of custom made and prefabricated posts made of various materials. The kind of posts affected to the choosing of luting cement and also core material. So that the restoration of teeth with posts and cores with crowns to be accomplished should have the choosing of suitable materials and techniques.
1. Fernandes AS, Dessai GS. Factors affecting the fracture resistance of post-core reconstructed teeth: a review. Int J Prosthodont 2001;14: 355-363.
2. Caputo AA, Standlee JP. Pins and posts--why, when and how. Dent Clin North Am 1976; 20: 299-311.
3. Hayashi M, Takahashi Y, Imazato S, Ebisu S. Fracture resistance of pulpless teeth restored with post-cores and crowns. Dent Mater 2006; 22: 477-485.
4. Hajizadeh H, Namazikhah MS, Moghaddas MJ, Ghavamnasiri M, Majidinia S. Effect of posts on the fracture resistance of load-cycled endodontically-treated premolars restored with direct composite resin. J Contemp Dent Pract 2009; 10: 10-17.
5. Reeh ES, Douglas WH, Messer HH. Stiffness of endodontically-treated teeth related to restoration technique. J Dent Res 1989; 68: 1540-1544.
6. Heydecke G, Butz F, Strub JR. Fracture strength and survival rate of endodontically treated maxillary incisors with approximal cavities after restoration with different post and core systems: an in-vitro study. J Dent 2001; 29: 427-433.
7. Lang H, Korkmaz Y, Schneider K, Raab WH. Impact of endodontic treatments on the rigidity of the root. J Dent Res 2006; 85: 364- 368.
8. Cheung W. A review of the management of endodontically treated teeth: post, core and the final restoration. J Am Dent Assoc 2005; 136: 611-619.
9. Sivers JE, Johnson WT. Restoration of endodontically treated teeth. Dent Clin North Am 1992; 36: 631-650.
10. Goodacre CJ, Spolnik KJ. The prosthodontic management of endodontically treated teeth: a literature review. Part II. Maintaining the apical seal. J Prosthodont 1995; 4: 51-53.
11. Wu MK, Pehlivan Y, Kontakiotis EG, Wesselink PR. Microleakage along apical root fillings and cemented posts. J Prosthet Dent 1998; 79: 264-269.
12. Abramovitz L, Lev R, Fuss Z, Metzger Z. The unpredictability of seal after post space preparation: a fluid transport study. J Endod 2001; 27: 292-295.
13. Stern N, Hirshfeld Z. Principles of preparing endodontically treated teeth for dowel and core restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1973; 30: 162-165.
14. Tilk MA, Lommel TJ, Gerstein H. A study of mandibular and maxillary root widths to determine dowel size. J Endod 1979; 5: 79-82.
15. Lloyd PM, Palik JF. The philosophies of dowel diameter preparation: a literature review. J Prosthet Dent 1993; 69: 32-36.
16. Bergman B, Lundquist P, Sjogren U, Sundquist G. Restorative and endodontic results after treatment with cast posts and cores. J Prosthet Dent 1989; 61: 10-15.
17. Trabert KC, Cooney JP. The endodontically treated tooth. Restorative concepts and techniques. Dent Clin North Am 1984; 28: 923-951.
18. Rolf KC, Parker MW, Pelleu GB. Stress analysis of five prefabricated endodontic dowel designs: a photoelastic study. Oper Dent 1992; 17: 86-92.
19. Rosenstiel SF, Land MF, Fujimoto J. Contemporary fixed prosthodontics. 2nd ed. St Louis: Mosby; 1995: 278-283.
20. Kane JJ, Burgess JO. Modification of the resistance form of amalgam coronal-radicular restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1991; 65: 470- 474.
21. Newman MP, Yaman P, Dennison J, Rafter M, Billy E. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with composite posts. J Prosthet Dent 2003; 89: 360-367.
22. Al-Wahadni AM, Hamdan S, Al-Omiri M, Hammad MM, Hatamleh MM. Fracture resistance of teeth restored with different post systems: in vitro study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008; 106: e77-e83.
23. Ichikawa Y, Akagawa Y, Nikai H, Tsuru H. Tissue compatibility and stability of a new zirconia ceramic in vivo. J Prosthet Dent 1992; 68: 322-326.
24. Watanabe T, Miyazaki M, Inage H, Kurokawa H. Determination of elastic modulus of the components at dentin-resin interface using the ultrasonic device. Dent Mater J 2004; 23: 361- 367.
25. Torbjörner A, Fransson B. A literature review on the prosthetic treatment of structurally compromised teeth. Int J Prosthodont 2004; 17: 369-376.
26. Plotino G, Grande NM, Bedini R, Pameijer CH, Somma F. Flexural properties of endodontic posts and human root dentin. Dent Mater 2007; 23: 1129-35.
27. Moosavi H, Maleknejad F, Kimyai S. Fracture resistance of endodontically-treated teeth restored using three root-reinforcement methods. J Contemp Dent Pract 2008; 9: 30- 37.
28. Sirimai S, Riis DN, Morgano SM. An in vitro study of the fracture resistance and the incidence of vertical root fracture of pulpless teeth restored with six post-and-core systems. J Prosthet Dent 1999; 81: 262-269.
29. Freedman GA. Esthetic post-and-core treatment. Dent Clin North Am 2001; 45: 103- 116.
30. Cormier CJ, Burns DR, Moon P. In vitro comparison of the fracture resistance and failure mode of fiber, ceramic, and conventional post systems at various stages of restoration. J Prosthodont 2001; 10: 26-36.
31. Pegoretti A, Fambri L, Zappini G, Bianchetti M. Finite element analysis of a glass fibre reinforced composite endodontic post. Biomaterials 2002; 23: 2667-2682.
32. Ferrari M, Vichi A, Garcia-Godoy F. Clinical evaluation of fiber-reinforced epoxy resin posts and cast post and cores. Am J Dent 2000; 13: 15B-18B.
33. Coelho Santos GJr, El-Mowafy O, Rubo JH. Diametral tensile strength of a resin composite core with nonmetallic prefabricated posts: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 2004; 91: 335- 341.
34. Peters OA. Current challengers and concepts in the preparation of root canal systems: a review. J Endod 2004; 30: 559-567.
35. Wilson PHR, Fisher NL, Bartlett DW. Direct core materials. Dent Update 2003; 30: 362- 368.
36. Chutinan S, Platt JA, Cochran MA, Moore BK. Volumetric dimensional change of six direct core materials. Dent Mater 2004; 20: 345-351.
37. Azer SS, Drummond JL, Campbell SD, El Moneim Zaki A. Influence of core buildup material on the fatigue strength of an allceramic crown. J Prosthet Dent 2001; 86: 624- 631.
38. Suzuki MM. Recent commercial composite formulations. Oper Dent Suppl 2001; 6:145- 151.
39. Cohen BI, Condos S, Deutsch AS, Musikant BL. Fracture strength of three different core materials in combination with three different endodontic posts. Int J Prosthodont 1994; 7: 178-182.
40. Zalkind M, Shkury S, Stern N, Heling I. Effect of prefabricated metal post-head design on the retention of various core materials. J Oral Rehabil 2000; 27: 483-487.
41. Gu S, Rasimick BJ, Deutsch AS, Musikant BL. In vitro evaluation of five core materials. J Prosthodont 2007; 16: 25-30.
42. Ricketts DNL, Tait CM, Higgins AJ. Post and core systems, refinements to tooth preparation and cementation. Br Dent J 2005; 198: 533- 541.
43. Monticelli F, Osorio R, Sadek FT, Radovic I, Toledano M, Ferrari M. Surface treatments for improving bond strength to prefabricated fiber posts: a literature review. Oper Dent 2008; 33: 346-355.
44. Duret B, Duret F, Reynaud M. Long-life physical property preservation and postendodontic rehabilitation with the Composipost. Compend Contin Educ Dent Suppl 1996; 20: s50-s56.
45. Tay FR, Pashley DH. Monoblocks in root canals: a hypothetical or a tangible goal. J Endod 2007; 33: 391-398.
46. Hill EE. Dental cements for definitive luting: a review and practical clinical considerations. Dent Clin North Am 2007; 51: 643-658.
47. Pegoraro TA, da Silva NR, Carvalho RM. Cements for use in esthetic dentistry. Dent Clin North Am 2007; 51: 453-471.
48. Nakabayashi N, Pashley DH. Hybridization of dental hard tissues. Chicago: Quintessence; 1998: 13-15.
49. Donovan TE, Cho GC. Contemporary evaluation of dental cements. Compend Contin Educ Dent 1999; 20: 197-219.
50. Smith DC. A new dental cement. Br Dent J 1968; 125: 381-384.
51. Power JM, Sakaguchi RL. Craig’s Restorative dental materials. 12th ed. St Louis: Mosby; 2002: 113-116.
52. Diaz-Arnold AM, Vargas MA, Haselton DR. Current status of luting agents for fixed prosthodontics. J Prosthet Dent 1999; 81: 135- 141.
53. Cho E, Kopel H, White SN. Moisture susceptibility of resin-modified glass-ionomer materials. Quintessence Int 1995; 26: 351-358.
54. O’Brien W. Dental materials and their selection. 4th ed. Chicago: Quintessence; 2008: 165-167.
55. Mezzomo E, Massa F, Libera SD. Fracture resistance of teeth restored with two different post-and-core designs cemented with two different cements: an in vitro study. Part I. Quintessence Int 2003; 34: 301-306.
56. Caughman WF, OíConnor RP, Williams HA, Rueggeberg FA. Retention strengths of three cements using full crown preparations restored with amalgam. Am J Dent 1992; 5: 61-63.
57. Darr AH, Jacobsen PH. Conversion of dual cure luting cements. J Oral Rehabil 1995; 22: 43-47.
58. Breeding LC, Dixon DL, Caughman WF. The curing potential of light-activated composite resin luting agents. J Prosthet Dent 1991; 65: 512-518.
59. White SN, Yu Z, Tom JF, Sangsurasak S. In vivo microleakage of luting cements for cast crowns. J Prosthet Dent 1994; 71: 333-338.
60. White SN, Furuichi R, Kyomen SM. Microleakage through dentin after crown cementation. J Endod 1995; 21: 9-12.
61. Van Landuyt KL, Snauwaert J, De Munck J, Peumans M, Yoshida Y, Poitevin A, et al. Systematic review of the chemical composition of contemporary dental adhesives. Biomaterials 2007; 28: 3757-3785.
62. Christensen GL. Has the “total-etch” concept disappeared? J Am Dent Assoc 2006; 137: 817-820.
63. Radovic I, Mazzitelli C, Chieffi N, Ferrari M. Evaluation of the adhesion of fiber posts cemented using different adhesive approaches. Eur J Oral Sci 2008; 116: 557-563.
64. De Munck J, Vargas M, Van Landuyt KL, Hikita K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Bonding of an auto-adhesive luting material to enamel and dentin. Dent Mater 2004; 20: 963- 971.
65. Hikita K, Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Ikeda T, Van Landuyt K, Maida T, et al. Bonding effectiveness of adhesive luting agents to enamel and dentin. Dent Mater 2007; 23: 71- 80.
66. Sen D, Nayir E, Pamuk S. Comparison of the tensile bond strength of high-noble, noble, and base metal alloys bonded to enamel. J Prosthet Dent 2000; 84: 561-566.
67. Bitter K, Kielbassa AM. Post-endodontic restorations with adhesively luted fiberreinforced composite post systems: a review. Am J Dent 2007; 20: 353-360.
68. Aksornmuang J, Foxton RM, Nakajima M, Tagami J. Microtensile bond strength of a dual-cure resin core material to glass and quartz fibre posts. J Dent 2004; 32: 443-450.
69. Goracci C, Corciolani G, Vichi A, Ferrari M. Light-transmitting ability of marketed fiber posts. J Dent Res 2008; 87: 1122-1126.
70. Sahafi A, Peutzfeldt A, Asmussen E. Gotfredsen K. Bond strength of resin cement to dentin and to surface-treated posts of titanium alloy, glass fiber, and zirconia. J Adhes Dent 2003; 5: 153-162.
71. Bitter K, Meyer-Lueckel H, Priehn K, Martus P, Kielbassa AM. Bond strengths of resin cements to fiber-reinforced composite posts. Am J Dent 2006; 19: 138-142.
72. Perdigão J, Gomes G, Lee IK. The effect of silane on the bond strengths of fiber posts. Dent Mater 2006; 22: 752-758.
73. Oliveira FC, Denehy GE, Boyer DB. Fracture resistance of endodontically prepared teeth using various restorative materials. J Am Dent Assoc 1987; 115: 57-60.
74. Peroz I, Blankenstein F, Lange KP, Naumann M. Restoring endodontically treated teeth with posts and cores: a review. Quintessence Int 2005; 36: 737-746.
75. Sorensen JA, Martinoff JT. Intracoronal reinforcement and coronal coverage: a study of endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1984; 51: 780-784.