Adhesive Bond Strength between Resin Cements and Zirconia Ceramics with Metal Adhesive Primers
The purpose of this study was to compare shear bond strength between self adhesive resin cement (Rely X™ U100) and resin cement with self-etch system (Panavia® F 2.0) to zirconia ceramics, treated with two metal adhesive primers (ALLOY PRIMER®, Metal/Zirconia Primer®) after water storage 24 hours and thermocycling. One hundred and twenty zirconia ceramic specimens (15x15x2 mm.) were used in this study, randomly divided into three groups of forty by type of surface treatment. Group 1 was a control group (no treatment-NT). Group 2 was treated with ALLOY PRIMER®(AP), Group 3 with Metal/Zirconia Primer®(MZ). Each group was divided into two subgroups of twenty by type of resin cement (Rely X™ U100 and Panavia® F 2.0), luted two resin composite rods on a diagonal line of the zirconia ceramic specimens. Each group was then divided into two subgroups of ten (20 specimens) by storage type: either in water at 37°C for 24 hours or thermocycling for 1000 cycles at 5°C and 55°C. The shear bond strength of all test groups were tested by Instron® testing machine. The result of this study found that the mean of the shear bond strength of Panavia® F 2.0 was significantly higher than that of Rely X™ U100 (p<0.01). The mean of the shear bond strength of the ALLOY PRIMER® treated surface group was significantly higher than those of the Metal/Zirconia Primer® and the control group (p<0.01). The mean of the shear bond strength of the water storage group was significantly higher than that of the thermocycling group (p<0.01). The bonding potential of each control group after water storage and thermocycling was the lowest. In conclusion, the shear bond strength of Panavia® F 2.0 seems better than Rely X™ U100. Metal adhesive primers seem to promote the shear bond strength between zirconia ceramics and resin cements. Aging condition such as thermocycling process decreases the shear bond strength between zirconia ceramics and resin cements.
1. Derand P, Derand T. Bond strength of luting cements to zirconium oxide ceramics. Int J Prosthodont 2000; 13: 131-135.
2. Wolfart M, Lehmann F, Wolfart S, Kern M. Durability of the resin bond strength to zirconia ceramic after using different surface conditioning methods. Dent Mater Dent Mater 2007; 23: 2007; 23: 45-50.
3. Ernst CP, Cohnen U, Stender E, Willershausen B. In vitro retentive strength of zirconium oxide ceramic crowns using different luting agents. J Prosthet Dent 2005; 93: 551-558.
4. Nakamura S, Yoshida K, Kamada K, Atsuta M. Bonding between resin luting cement and glass infiltrated alumina-reinforced ceramics with silane coupling agent. J Oral Rehabil 2004; 31: 785-789.
5. Valandro LF, Leite FP, Scotti R, Bottino MA, Neisser MP. Effect of ceramic surface treatment on the microtensile bond strength between a resin cement and an alumina-based ceramic. J Adhes Dent 2004; 6: 327-332.
6. Bottino MA, Valandro LF, Scotti R, Buso L. Effect of surface treatments on the resin bond to zirconium-based ceramic. Int J Prosthodont 2005; 18: 60-65.
7. Jardel V, Degrange M, Picard B, Derrien G. Correlation of topography to bond strength of etched ceramic. Int J Prosthodont Int J Prosthodont 1999; 12: 1999; 12: 59-64.
8. Söderholm KJ, Shang SW. Molecular orientation of silane at the surface of colloidal silica. J Dent Res 1993; 72: 1050-1054.
9. Della Bona A, Anusavice KJ, Shen C. Microtensile strength of composite bonded to hot-pressed ceramics. J Adhes Dent 2000; 2: 305-313.
10. Debnath S, Wundera SL, McCool JI, Baran GR. Silane treatment effects on glass/resin interfacial shear strengths. Dent Mater Dent Mater 2003; 19: 441-448.
11. Madani M, Chu FC, McDonald AV, Smales RJ. Effects of surface treatments on shear bond strengths between a resin cement and an alumina core. J Prosthet Dent J Prosthet Dent 2000; 83: 644- 2000; 83: 644- 647.
12. Özcan M, Alkumru HN, Gemalmaz D. The effect of surface treatment on the shear bond strength of luting cement to a glass-infiltrated alumina ceramic. Int J Prosthodont Int J Prosthodont 2001; 14: 2001; 14: 335-339.
13. Qualtrough AJ, Piddock V. Dental ceramics: what’s new? Dent Update 2002; 29: 25-33.
14. Pilathadka S, Vahalova D. Contemporary allceramic systems, Part-2. Acta Medica 2007; 50: 105-107.
15. Kelly JR. Dental Ceramics: current thinking and trends. Dent Clin North Am 2004; 48: 513-530.
16. Kern M, Wegner SM. Bonding to zirconia ceramic: adhesion methods and their durability. Dent Mater 1998; 14: 64-71.
17. Wegner SM, Kern M. Long-term resin bond strength to zirconia ceramic. J Adhes Dent 2000; 2: 139-147.
18. Wegner SM, Gerdes W, Kern M. Effect of different artificial aging conditions on ceramic-composite bond strength. Int J Prosthodont 2002; 15: 267-272.
19. Özcan, M. The use of chairside silica coating for different dental applications: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 2002; 87: 469-472.
20. Piwowarczyk A, Lauer HC, Sorensen JA. The shear bond strength between luting cements and zirconia ceramics after two pretreatments. Oper Dent 2005; 30: 382-388.
21. Tsuo Y, Yoshida K, Atsuta M. Effects of alumina-blasting and adhesive primers on bonding between resin luting agent and zirconia ceramics. Dent Mater Dent Mater 2006 ; 25: 2006 ; 25: 669-674.
22. Sirimongkolwattana S. Metal adhesive primer. CM Dent J 2005; 26: 73-82.
23. Yoshida K, Taira Y, Matsumura H, Atsuta M. Effect of adhesive primers on bonding a prosthetic composite resin to metals. J Prosthet Dent 1993; 69: 357-362.
24. Matsumura H, Shimoe S, Nagano K, Atsuta M. Effect of noble metal conditioners on bonding between prosthetic composite material and silver-palladium-copper-gold alloy. J Prosthet Dent 1999 ; 81: 710-714.
25. Sarafianou A, Seimenis I, Papadopoulos T. Effectiveness of different adhesive primers on the bond strength between an indirect composite resin and a base metal alloy. J Prosthet Dent 2008; 99: 377-387.
26. Watanabe I, Matsumura H, Atsuta M. Effect of two metal primers on adhesive bonding with type IV gold alloys. J Prosthet Dent 1995; 73: 1995; 73: 299-303.
27. Silikas N, Wincott PL, Vaughan D, Watts DC, Eliades G. Surface characterization of precious alloys treated with thione metal primers. Dent Mater 2007; 23: 665-673.
28. Lindgren J, Smeds J, Sjögren G. Effect of surface treatments and aging in water on bond strength to zirconia. Oper Dent 2008; 33: 675- 2008; 33: 675- 681.
29. Yoshida K, Atsuta M. Effects of adhesive primers for noble metals on shear bond strengths of resin cements. J Dent 1997; 25: 1997; 25: 53-58.
30. Yanagida H, Matsumura H, Taira Y, Atsuta M, Shimoe S. Adhesive bonding of composite material to cast titanium with varying surface preparations. J Oral Rehabil J Oral Rehabil 2002; 29: 121- 2002; 29: 121- 126.
31. Yoshida K, Tsuo Y, Atsuta M. Bonding of dual-cured resin cement to zirconia ceramic using phosphate acid ester monomer and zirconate coupler. J Biomed Mater Res part B: Appl Biomater 2006; 77: 28-33.
32. Edelhoff D, Özcan M. To what extent does the longevity of fixed dental prostheses depend on the function of the cement? Working group 4 materials: cementation. Clin Oral Implants Res 2007; 18: 193-204.
33. Burke FJ, Fleming GJ, Nathanson D, Marquis PM. Are adhesive technologies needed to support ceramics? An assessment of the current evidence. J Adhes Dent 2002; 4: 7-22.
34. Blatz MB, Sadan A, Martin J, Lang B. In vitro evaluation of shear bond strengths of resin to densely-sintered high-purity zirconium-oxide ceramic after long-term storage and thermal cycling. J Prosthet Dent 2004; 91: 356-362.
35. Thurmond JW, Barkmeier WW, Wildwerding TM. Effect of porcelain surface treatments on bond strengths of composite resin bonded to porcelain. J Prosthet Dent 1994; 72: 355-359.
36. Kuraray Co., Ltd. Panavia Technical Information. Report No. US089, Osaka, Japan; 1999.
37. De Munck J, Vargas M, Van Landuyt K, Hikita K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Bonding of an auto-adhesive luting materials to enamel and dentin. Dent Mater Dent Mater 2004; 20: 2004; 20: 963-971.
38. Phark JH, Duarte S Jr, Blatz M, Sadan A. An in vitro evaluation of the long-term resin bond to a new densely sintered high-purity zirconium-oxide ceramic surface. J Prosthet Dent 2009; 101: 29-38.
39. Mese A, Burrow MF, Tyas MJ. Sorption and solubility of luting cements in different solutions. Dent Mater 2008; 27: 702-709.
40. Technical product profile Rely X™ Unicem. Available from URL http://multimedia.mmm. com/mws/mediawebserver.dyn?6666660 Zjcf6lVs6EVs666iFPCOrrrrQ- (2007, March)
41. Söderholm KJ, Roberts MJ. Influence of water exposure on the tensile strength of composites. J Dent Res 1990; 69: 1812-1816.
42. Blatz MB, Sadan A, Kern M. Resin-ceramic bonding: a review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent 2003; 89: 268-274.
43. Mair LH. Surface permeability and degradation of dental composites resulting from oral temperature changes. Dent Mater 1989; 5: 247-255.
44. Musto P, Ragosta G, Scarinza G, Mascia L. Probing the molecular interactions in the diffusion of water through epoxy and epoxybismaleimide networks. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 2002; 40: 922-938.
45. Indrani DJ, Cook WD, Televantos F, Tyas MJ, Harcourt JK. Fracture toughness of water-aged resin composite restorative materials. Dent Mater 1995; 11: 201-207. 1995; 11: 201-207.
46. Özcan M, Vallittu PK. Effect of surface conditioning methods on the bond strength of luting cement to ceramics. Dent Mater 2003; 19: 725-731.
47. Matinlinna JP, Lassila LV, Vallittu PK. Pilot evaluation of resin composite cement adhesion to zirconia using a novel silane system. Act Odontol Scand 2007; 65: 44-51.
48. Yang B, Barloi A, Kern M. Influence of airabrasion on zirconia ceramic bonding using an adhesive composite resin. Dent Mater Dent Mater 2010; 26: 44-50.
49. Polat ZS, Tacir IH, Eskimez S, Celik MY. Retentive force of three fiber-reinforced resin composite posts and a zirconia post cemented with two adhesive luting agents: in vitro study. Dent Mater J 2007; 26: 672-676.
50. Yoshida K, Tsuo Y, Atsuta M. Bonding of dual-cured resin cement to zirconia ceramic using phosphate acid ester monomer and zirconate coupler. J Biomed Mater Res part B: Appl Biomater 2006; 77: 28-33.
51. Kern M, Thompson VP. Durability of resin bonds to pure titanium. J Prosthodont 1995; 4: 1995; 4: 16-22.
52. Koizumi H, Furuchi M, Tanoue N, Yanagida H, Yoneyama T, Matsumura H. Bond strength to primed Ti-6Al-7Nb alloy of two acrylic resin adhesives. Dent Mater J Dent Mater J 2006; 25: 286- 2006; 25: 286- 290.
53. Yun JY, Ha SR, Lee JB, Kim SH. Effect of sandblasting and various metal primers on the shear bond strength of resin cement to Y-TZP ceramic. Dent Mater 2010; 26: 650-658.
54. de Souza GM, Silva NR, Paulillo LA, De Goes MF, Rekow ED, Thompson VP. Bond strength to high-crystalline content zirconia after different surface treatments. J Biomed Mater Res part B: Appl Biomater Mater Res part B: Appl Biomater 2010; 93: 2010; 93: 318-323.
55. Taira Y, Yanagida H, Matsumura H, Yoshida K, Atsuta M, Suzuki S. Adhesive bonding of titanium with a thione-phosphate dual functional primer and self-curing luting agents. Eur J Oral Sci 2000; 108: 456-460.
56. Ikemura K, Endo T. A review of our development of dental adhesives - effects of radical polymerization initiators and adhesive monomers on adhesion. Dent Mater J Dent Mater J 2010; 29: 109-121.
57. Ikemura K, Tay FR, Nishiyama N, Pashley DH, Endo T. Design of new phosphonic acid monomers for dental adhesives - synthesis of (meth) acryloxyalkyl 3-phosphonopropionates and evaluation of their adhesion-promoting functions. Dent Mater 2006; 25: 566-575.
58. Van Landuyt KL, Yoshida Y, Hirata I, Snauwaert J, De Munck J, Okazaki M, Suzuki K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Influence of the chemical structure of functional monomers on their adhesive performance. J Dent Res 2008; 87; 757-761.