Effects of Stainless Steel Miniscrew Length on Primary Stability: An in vitro Study
Objectives: To determine the effects of different stainless steel miniscrew implant lengths on maximum insertion torque and pull-out strength in a location with relatively low bone density and cortical bone thickness.
Materials and Methods: Thirty-six stainless steel miniscrew implants were evenly assigned to three groups (n=12) according to size: 2 mm x 8 mm, 2 mm x 10 mm, and 2 mm x 12 mm. The implants were wrenched into artificial bone blocks. The artificial bone blocks were made of two different densities, 20 pounds per cubic foot (pcf) and 10 pcf, to replicate the cortical and cancellous bone on the modified infrazygomatic crest area, respectively. The maximum insertion torque and pull-out strength were measured using a digital torque gauge and universal testing machine, respectively. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey's multiple comparison test were performed. The significance level was determined at 5%.
Results: The 2 mm x 12 mm miniscrew implants had significantly greater maximum insertion torque (6.03 + 0.21 Ncm) than the 2 mm x 8 mm (4.91 + 0.20 Ncm) and 2 mm x 10 mm (4.88 + 0.18 Ncm) implants, whereas there was no significant difference between the 2 mm x 8 mm and the 2 mm x 10 mm implants. The pull-out strength of the 2 mm x 8 mm, 2 mm x 10 mm and 2 mm x 12 mm miniscrew implants were 76.49 + 1.54 N, 86.22 + 2.16 N and 108.91 + 2.88 N, respectively. The pull-out strength significantly increased in a length-dependent manner.
Conclusions: All groups provide appropriate maximum insertion torque for miniscrew implant placement in a location with relatively low bone density and cortical bone thickness.
1. Uesugi S, Kokai S, Kanno Z, Ono T. Prognosis of primary and secondary insertions of orthodontic miniscrews: What we have learned from 500 implants. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2017; 152(2): 224-231.
2. Papadopoulos MA, Tarawneh F. The use of miniscrew implants for temporary skeletal anchorage in orthodontics: a comprehensive review. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2007; 103(5): e6-15.
3. Lin JJ. Creative orthodontics blending the damon system & TADs to manage difficult malocclusions. Taipei: Yong Chieh Co.; 2010: 149-208.
4. Lohalertkit C, Janhom A, Patanaporn V, Jotikasthira D. Comparison of infrazygomatic crest thicknesses between Thai patients with Class I and Class II skeletal pattern using cone-beam computed tomography. OJ Thai Assoc Orthod 2018; 8: 4-12.
5. Deguchi T, Nasu M, Murakami K, Yabuuchi T, Kamioka H, Takano-Yamamoto T. Quantitative evaluation of cortical bone thickness with computed tomographic scanning for orthodontic implants. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006; 129(6): 721 e7-12.
6. Tseng YC, Pan CY, Liu PH, Yang YH, Chang HP, Chen CM. Resonance frequency analysis of miniscrew implant stability. J Oral Sci 2018; 60(1): 64-69.
7. Buschang PH, Kim KB. Considerations for optimizing the use of miniscrew implants in orthodontic practice. In: Kim KB, ed: Temporary Skeletal Anchorage Devices, Heidelberg: Springer; 2014: 1-27.
8. Araghbidikashani M, Golshah A, Nikkerdar N, Rezaei M. In-vitro impact of insertion angle on primary stability of miniscrews. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2016; 150(3): 436-443.
9. Migliorati M, Drago S, Gallo F, et al. Immediate versus delayed loading: comparison of primary stability loss after miniscrew placement in orthodontic patients—a single-centre blinded randomized clinical trial. Eur J Orthod 2016; 38(6): 652-659.
10. Shah AH, Behrents RG, Kim KB, Kyung HM, Buschang PH. Effects of screw and host factors on insertion torque and pullout strength. Angle Orthod 2012; 82(4): 603-610.
11. Meira TM, Tanaka OM, Ronsani MM, et al. Insertion torque, pull-out strength and cortical bone thickness in contact with orthodontic mini-implants at different insertion angles. Eur J Orthod 2013; 35(6): 766-771.
12. Migliorati M, Benedicenti S, Signori A, et al. Miniscrew design and bone characteristics: an experimental study of primary stability. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2012; 142(2): 228-234.
13. Baumgaertel S. Predrilling of the implant site: Is it necessary for orthodontic mini-implants?. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010; 137(6): 825-829.
14. Lim SA, Cha JY, Hwang CJ. Insertion torque of orthodontic miniscrews according to changes in shape, diameter and length. Angle Orthod 2008; 78(2): 234-240.
15. Lin SY, Mimi Y, Tak CM, Chiong FKW, Chew WH. A study of success rate of miniscrew implants as temporary anchorage devices in singapore. Int J Dent 2015; 2015: 1-10.
16. Holm L, Cunningham SJ, Petrie A, Cousley RR. An in vitro study of factors affecting the primary stability of orthodontic mini-implants. Angle Orthod 2012; 82(6): 1022-1028.
17. Lim HJ, Choi YJ, Evans CA, Hwang HS. Predictors of initial stability of orthodontic miniscrew implants. Eur J Orthod 2011; 33(5): 528-532.
18. Lai TT, Chen MH. Factors affecting the clinical success of orthodontic anchorage: Experience with 266 temporary anchorage devices. J Dent Sci 2014; 9(1): 49-55.
19.Suzuki EY, Suzuki B, Aramrattana A, Harnsiriwattanakit K, Kowanich N. Assessment of miniscrew implant stability by resonance frequency analysis: a study in human cadavers. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2010; 68(11): 2682-2689.
20. Reynders RAM, Ronchi L, Ladu L, Etten-Jamaludin FV, Bipat S. Insertion torque and success of orthodontic mini-implants: a systematic review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2012; 142(5): 596-614.
21. Suzuki M, Deguchi T, Watanabe H, et al. Evaluation of optimal length and insertion torque for miniscrews. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2013; 144(2): 251-259.
22. Motoyoshi M, Hirabayashi M, Uemura M, Shimizu N. Recommended placement torque when tightening an orthodontic mini-implant. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006; 17(1): 109-114.
23. Laursen MG, Melsen B, Cattaneo PM. An evaluation of insertion sites for mini-implants: a micro - CT study of human autopsy material. Angle Orthod 2013; 83(2): 222-229.